Search for: "Phelps, Appeal of" Results 321 - 340 of 402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
(Thanks to How Appealing’s Howard Bashman for the link.) [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm by Terry Lenamon
Bell On appeal, post-conviction DNA forensic evidence can be presented in death penalty cases. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Litigation: Greg May at the California Blog of Appeal asks Why Are Some Lawyers and Their Clients Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm by Daniel Richardson
Norman Cleaveland before his appeal was heard also played a role. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
Phelps, a motion for new trial in a 1995 murder case (resulting from a murder a decade before that), based on the revelation that a key state’s witness had been hypnotized. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, a plaintiff must plead the attorney’s intentional deceit damages caused by the deceit (see Doscher v Mannatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 148 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am by INFORRM
On appeal, the Superior Court reinstated the first instance court’s order. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
Holder Issue: Whether a court of appeals has jurisdiction to review the conclusion by the Board of Immigration Appeals that petitioner had failed to establish "to the satisfaction of the Attorney General" either "changed circumstances" or "extraordinary circumstances" to excuse the untimely filing of her asylum application under 8 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm by INFORRM
Judgment The applicant had previously appealed against his punishment in the Hungarian domestic courts, but his conviction had been upheld. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
 Emphasis is mine: The Franklin Mint Company and its principals, Stewart and Lynda Resnick, (collectively, Franklin Mint) appeal from a judgment dismissing their malicious prosecution action against the law firm Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP and attorney Mark S. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Both sides appealed and eventually, in 2013, the Appellate Division affirmed the valuation in most respects but concluded that a marketability discount should have been applied to the extent no such discount was already embedded in the trial court’s DCF valuation. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am by Ron Coleman
 Emphasis is mine: The Franklin Mint Company and its principals, Stewart and Lynda Resnick, (collectively, Franklin Mint) appeal from a judgment dismissing their malicious prosecution action against the law firm Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP and attorney Mark S. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:13 pm by Ron Coleman
 Emphasis is mine: The Franklin Mint Company and its principals, Stewart and Lynda Resnick, (collectively, Franklin Mint) appeal from a judgment dismissing their malicious prosecution action against the law firm Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP and attorney Mark S. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Koninklijke Philips Electronics Docket: 09-389 Issue: Whether a party contesting the jurisdiction of the district court must first move in the district court to vacate or set aside a default judgment pursuant to either Rule 55(c) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as a prerequisite to appealing the default judgment. [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:41 am by Ron Coleman
 Emphasis is mine: The Franklin Mint Company and its principals, Stewart and Lynda Resnick, (collectively, Franklin Mint) appeal from a judgment dismissing their malicious prosecution action against the law firm Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP and attorney Mark S. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Commissioner of Social Security    Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0312p.06 2008/08/22 Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
GMBH v Geox SPA (PatLit) (Gray on Claims) EWHC (Pat): PPDs and piecemeal litigation: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: When anticompetition spices up competition, greyhounds lose their appeal: Bookmakers’ Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors v Amalgamated Racing & Ors (IPKat) LOCOG demands Olympic Removals stop using Olympic symbol (IPKat) Infringing goods in transit: are patents more efficacious than trade marks? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
OHIM, José María Padilla Requena (1709 Blog) Inbev loses Budweiser CTM appeal: Anheuser-Busch Inc. v OHIM, Bud? [read post]