Search for: "Phil Waters" Results 321 - 340 of 348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2007, 3:38 am
None of the players was named in any published writing by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg yesterday, and so no one has Media immunity today. [read post]
15 May 2007, 3:39 am
None of the players was named in any published writing by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg, and so no one has Media immunity today. [read post]
14 May 2007, 4:03 am
In addition, we'll continue the practice of granting Media Immunity to any player mentioned in print or online by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:42 am
(If anyone is mentioned in print or on line today by Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg, he or she will have immunity tomorrow.) [read post]
9 May 2007, 3:29 am
None of the remaining players was mentioned by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg in the media yesterday, and so no one has immunity today. [read post]
8 May 2007, 2:41 am
None of the remaining players was mentioned by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg in the media yesterday, and so no one has immunity today. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:34 am
None of the remaining players was mentioned by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg in the media since last Thursday, and thus, no one has immunity today. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:43 am
None of the players was mentioned by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Gragg in yesterday's media, and so no one has immunity today. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:00 am
None of the players was mentioned by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg in yesterday's media, and so no one has immunity today. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:51 am
That leaves 16 bureacrats in the running for the Ultimate Survivor, and given the lack of a mention of any of them by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg in yesterday's media, none of them have immunity today. [read post]
1 May 2007, 4:58 am
Since none of the contestants was mentioned by name yesterday in any writing by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg, no one's got immunity today. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:44 am
Here is how it works: Any player who is mentioned by name in print or on the internet in a by-lined writing by Nigel Jaquiss, Phil Stanford, or Randy Gragg will have immunity on the next voting day after the story appears. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 7:11 am
Hefielded calls from not only local and regional media, but national namesOprah Winfrey, Phil Donahue, and Geraldo Rivera. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:44 pm
Then all of the sudden, you stand up out of the water and roar like Godzilla. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
, to the evidence professors' e-mail list, and has given me permission to post it here.For those who follow the details of confrontation doctrine in the Supreme Court there was an interesting denial of certiorari yesterday.The high-water mark for the Supreme Court's reliability test as a substitute for actual confrontation was New Mexico v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:39 pm
The rodents in question (properly Marmota monax, cousin to squirrels, rats, marmots and the like) are featured along with their U.S. cousin Punxsutawney Phil on a brief CBC news video. [read post]