Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 321 - 340
of 177,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 1:10 pm
The post A Little Too Much Sex on Plaintiff's Mind? [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:37 am
As a result, plaintiff says, he was denied a promotion, received command disciplines (CD's) and was removed from the DWI conditions post. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
The court granted defendant's motion to disqualify plaintiff's infringement expert because of a conflict of interest based on the expert's past work for defendant in two prior ITC investigations involving the same accused products. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:45 pm
This blog has covered the lawsuit against plaintiff's class action lawyers (Bill Lerach, lawyers Kevin Roddy and Spencer Burkholz, and the Milberg law firm) by Grand Casinos and Lyle Berman previously (here and here). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:53 am
Plaintiffs sued a town in Connecticut under the First Amendment because they were not allowed to attend their granddaughter's funeral. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:28 am
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' infringement action for lack of personal jurisdiction was granted where defendant discovered that a relative of one of plaintiff's employees was the purchaser of defendant's product in the forum. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
The court denied plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to defendant's inequitable conduct claim based on the theory that plaintiff buried relevant prior art among 597 other prior art references. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 11:12 am
The plaintiff’s initial complaint was eventually dismissed because the plaintiff failed to have the defendant properly served under the state requirements. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
After denying defendant’s motion to increase the number of claim terms to be construed, the court granted defendant’s alternative motion to reduce the number of claims asserted by plaintiff. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:39 am
To facilitate this arrangement, however, plaintiff had to add defendant’s name to his truck’s title. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 12:26 pm
In In re BitTorrent Adult Film Copyright Infringement cases, in which the Court has been concerned about "indicia of improper conduct" by plaintiff's counsel, the plaintiff's lawyer has filed a declaration claiming that the misconduct was the result of an error, and was not intentional. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:57 am
The court hearing the case rejected the insurance company’s argument and required it to cover the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Apparently, the plaintiff alleged that the County had failed to issue a proper “notice to redeem” as required by Nassau County Administrative Code § 5-51.0(c).When the defendant moved for pre-trial dismissal of the litigation, (via a motion for summary judgment), and the plaintiff moved to amend its complaint to add another entity as a party-plaintiff, the judge granted relief in the defendant's favor, while denying the… [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
The court noted that the clear language of the settlement agreement conflicted with the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Release only applied to the truck driver. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:04 pm
Continue reading › The post The Impact of a Plaintiff’s Partial Fault in a Washington, D.C. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
For its part, Staples did not challenge, much less rebut, plaintiff’s jurisdictional allegations. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:09 am
The car was primarily used by the plaintiff’s mother to run local errands. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:01 pm
Plaintiff’s submission failed to demonstrate to the court’s satisfaction how such injunctive relief would not unlawfully impair defendant’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 6:03 am
Defendant was the insurance agent who assisted in obtaining these bonds, and in conjunction with getting the bonds, plaintiff, plaintiff’s husband, plaintiff’s step-son, and the business were required to sign an indemnity agreement. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 8:35 am
"[Plaintiff's] sample requests are intended to . . . identify the nature and composition of the . . . product as [defendant] intends for it to be sold. . . . this matter will not be decided based on a hypothetical product. [read post]
