Search for: "Price v Price"
Results 321 - 340
of 18,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2008, 10:30 am
R v Goldshield Group plc and others [2008] UKHL 17; [2008] WLR (D) 388 “An allegation of price fixing carried out in circumstances of secretive and deceptive behaviour was insufficient of itself to found a charge of conspiracy to defraud. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 5:19 am
People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:26 am
Imagine Medispa, LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:52 am
Although FTC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:38 pm
The decisions are In re: New Jersey Title Insurance Litigation, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,921 and McCray v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
In Chappell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
That is, while the complaint asserts that the company not only was investigated for participating in a price fixing conspiracy but in fact actually engaged in price fixing, allegations connecting McKesson to price-fixing or even to the investigation of price-fixing are entirely absent from the complaint. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:59 pm
A well-reasoned and pithy analysis of this type of issue was featured in a recent decision by the Complex Commercial Litigation Division of the Delaware Superior Court in the matter styled LDC Parent, LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:41 am
In SLS Federal Services, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 5:38 pm
With the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Inclusive Communities Project v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:59 pm
The judgment in Case T-340/03 France Télécom v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:52 pm
Axiom Plastics Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 2:12 pm
Author Sodacan Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Deed Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertCourt of Appeal (The Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Nugee and Sir Christopher Floyd) Flitcraft Ltd and others v Price and another [2024] EWCA Civ 136 (27 Feb 2024)On 31 Jan 2024, the Court of Appeal (consisting of The Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Nugee and Sir Christopher Floyd) heard two [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:15 pm
However, the court rejected the manufacturers’ contention that the artful pleading doctrine applied because the Sherman Act applied to the claims, which were interstate and international in nature.The decision is State of Mississippi v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:34 pm
Therefore, Feesers and Sodexo were not competing purchasers.The January 7 decision in Feesers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:25 pm
In 2007, the Supreme Court dramatically changed the landscape when it decided Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:08 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:15 am
See IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund et al. v. [read post]
