Search for: "Price v. Martin" Results 321 - 340 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
Booking and price information can be found here. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
United States Travis Price, a South Carolina man whose charges were dropped after police body camera footage showed he did not fight an officer who attacked him is suing the city of Rock Hill and U.S Rep. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
* Cripps v Vakras – $450,000 ($100,000 aggravated damages) * Pedavoli v Fairfax Media – $350,000 – hard copy and online * Polias v Ryall – $340,000 (Facebook and gossip) * North Coast Children’s Home Inc v Martin – $250,000 * Tassone v Kirkham – $176,408.81 * Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney – $125,000 (Today Tonight) * Visscher… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:05 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
Supreme Court released its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:22 am
 Price £115 (but if you buy it from the publisher online, it's only £103.50. [read post]
The document also asks whether there are alternative ways to address disputes on pricing mechanisms, for example, ‘what point in the value chain provides an economic basis to calculate rates payable? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Evidence from Unicorns Posted by Yao Zeng, University of Washington, on Monday, January 23, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Capital formation, Cash flows, Dual-class stock, Institutional Investors, Liquidity, Mutual funds, Oversight, Private equity, Private firms, Risk, Tech companies, Venture capital firms “Fair Value” to be Determined by Merger Price—Merion v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:10 am by Frank J. Dürring
She cited to the Prussian General Helmuth von Moltke for “devising one of the world’s fist management matrices” when he assessed his officers on two scales: “clever v. dim and lazy v. energetic. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:10 am by Nietzer
She cited to the Prussian General Helmuth von Moltke for “devising one of the world’s fist management matrices” when he assessed his officers on two scales: “clever v. dim and lazy v. energetic. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
” Research & resources Blackstone’s Guide to the Defamation Act 2013, edited by James Price QC and Felicity McMahon (see our post). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:57 am by Florian Mueller
Martin Chakraborty of Hogan Lovells) also has a great defensive track record on his own, would have won this case anyway. [read post]