Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm
The court explained that in that situation, “pricing and contracting negotiations in the United States alone do not constitute or transform those extraterritorial activities into a sale within the United States for purposes of §271(a). [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
PEPPER ET AL., case number 17-204, the United States Supreme Court considered a case alleging Apple has monopolized the retail market for the sale of apps and has unlawfully used its monopolistic power to charge consumers higher-than competitive prices. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 6:47 pm
The payments the trustee did make were made in U.S. dollars, beneficiaries being resident in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:28 pm
United States provides hope to contractors that incur higher than anticipated costs on a requirements contract or, alternatively, on construction contracts where line item prices are based on estimated quantities. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:29 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:10 pm
See Charles Schwab Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
The Court asked the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in two cases: Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:53 pm
” – Chief Justice Roberts Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Snyder v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
In Loeza v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
McKesson Corp., 573 F.Supp.2d 431 (Aug. 26, 2008), the District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a national class action antitrust complaint, borrowing from the recent United States Supreme Court decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider its September 16 2010, ruling that plaintiffs in the ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation have no standing to pursue their price fixing claims against an ATM network and a group of banks. [read post]
