Search for: "Pro-Mark Services Inc" Results 321 - 340 of 561
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2012, 7:21 am by Ron
During lunch, Jim Sandman, President of the Legal Services Corporation and a 2012 College fellow-elect, will update attendees on bleak conditions facing LSC and describe a new mentoring initiative in the planning stages that will expand the pro bono consulting the College can offer to legal aid. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:31 pm by Stephen Jenei
  The service seems to still be a work in progress with some features marked “Coming Soon” and not yet available. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:50 am by Sonya Hubbard
There have been some big transitions at Gardner Denver, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:52 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Bit About Deduplication | Ball In Your Court - http://bit.ly/LygarL (Craig Ball) A Civ Pro Review of Jurisdiction - http://bit.ly/P7Tjcv (Josh Gilliland) Are Employers Still in Denial About eDiscovery Readiness? [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  In marking the 13th anniversary of this decision, President Obama said, “As we mark the anniversary of this historic civil rights decision, we reaffirm our commitment to fighting discrimination, and to addressing the needs and concerns of those living with disabilities. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc., 11 Civ. 9436 (ALC) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (First published in Competition Policy International, Antitrust Chronicle) “As a result of this alleged conspiracy, we believe that consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of the most popular titles. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
BROCK SPECIALTY SERVICES, LTD., et al., Appellees. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Striking of pleadings -- Error to enter order striking pleadings as sanction for refusal of plaintiff and her attorney to appear where written order does not make it apparent that court considered all factors set out in Kozel v. [read post]