Search for: "ROGERS v. STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2022, 11:01 am
Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) wants to know what has caused staff satisfaction at the agency to fall precipitously. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Maybe Google will now strike the same kind of agreement with Match Group, though it's unclear how soon the trial in the Match Group case will take place (theoretically the court could try to rush things the way Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers did in Epic Games v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:11 pm
From Hermes Int'l v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:50 pm
Inst., Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:34 am
First, in CSL Plasma Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am
Recently the editors of the New York Times seriously warned that some states likely would outlaw interracial marriage if Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:30 am
"); State v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:51 am
Techs., LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
See Wong v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:51 pm
United States 21-1352Issue: Whether plain-error review governs claims on appeal of error under Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Cook v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
If induced to comply with the House’s subpoenas, Bannon, Meadows, Navarro and Scavino—like their possible co-conspirators John Eastman, Michael Flynn, Jeffrey Clark, Roger Stone and Alex Jones—might invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am
Smart Study Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 11:31 pm
I haven't commented on Epic Games v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm
In Murray Braun v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
In the Ninth Circuit appeal of the Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:17 pm
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:17 pm
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
