Search for: "Reagan v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 1,099
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  As Kersch comments, in both of these widely seen film series, “Roe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:31 pm by Melanie Fontes
Bush and Ronald Reagan, he wrote briefs stating clearly his view that Roe had been wrongly decided and should be overturned. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
The analysis is lengthy, so I will state my main conclusions here: None of the critics defends the report’s actual reasoning, which is pretty obviously flawed. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Less familiar is a problem that is perhaps the obverse: plural and incompatible ways of generating claims to say “yes,” to give the final word on who shall rule and what the state shall do. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Nixon doubled down on the Southern Strategy during the general election, capturing six southern states compared to one for Democrat Hubert Humphrey. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Kent
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:30 am by Frank Pasquale
(Stephen Skowronek himself, in a recent LSE lecture, largely agrees with that, but has not ruled out the possibility that Trump himself can consolidate hegemony even more dramatically than Reagan, by stacking the courts with his appointees and hollowing out the administrative state.)Balkin's optimism reminds me of Pascal's wager. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]