Search for: "Reason v. Social Security Administration"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, along with its other much-anticipated decisions, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 11:27 am
Recent developments in the challenge to an executive order from the Biden Administration in Louisiana v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner did not return to work and applied for disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §605. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner did not return to work and applied for disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §605. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
Rodriguez was a Social Security Administration employee who used the SSA computers for purely personal reasons. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Accordingly, the court affirmed the well-reasoned judgment of the district court in its entirety. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:27 am
This can also include failing to report Social Security back-pay while receiving VA Pension. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
Taking the case on to the Supreme Court, the Social Security administrator, Michael J. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will use existing authorities to impose security and privacy requirements on consumer goods – hopefully in the form of standards but possibly in the form of mandates. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:53 pm
(citing, Martin v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 3:00 am
(Approved for publication.)In an appeal of the denial of Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"), the court held that the failure to consider plaintiff's obesity in combination with her other impairments (hypertension, diabetes, and peripheral neuropathy) violated Social Security Administration (the "Agency") regulations and rulings and Fourth Circuit precedent. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[W]hile the disclosure of non-material information is generally not required for the reasons discussed [above], adding the promotion of environmental protection to the other factors considered by the Commission in the administration of the disclosure process causes a different balance to be struck here. . . . . . . . [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:20 am
Employer has the burden of proof that a disability prevents the employee from reasonably performing the functions and duties of the position Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 57 AD3d 1057 New York State Correction Officer Edward J. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:14 am
Doctrine of Estoppel not available to bar an administrative action to correct an error notwithstanding its adverse impact on the individual Matter of Olick v D'Alessandro, 2011 NY Slip Op 50718(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Manuel J. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
"We cannot ignore the significant costs borne by our Nation when select groups are denied the means to absorb the values and skills upon which our social order rests," Brennan reasoned. [read post]
