Search for: "Refuse Materials, Inc." Results 321 - 340 of 3,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 11:58 am
By refusing to do so, [Defendant] plainly forfeited its right to rely on their issuance as an unfulfilled condition precedent to its obligation to repurchase [Plaintiff’s] options. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by Jed
L’Oreal USA, Inc. et al, 10 Civ. 5063, a United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York has refused to dismiss a class action brought by beauty salon owners against well known brand manufacturers for false advertising of salon-only products. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:10 am
In re Interpage Int’l Inc., Serial No. 87346100 (June 6, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:52 am
In re Homestead Strategic Holdings, Inc., Serial No. 90263580 (May 17, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am by Joseph Scapellato
MoCA to support.[32] Without Büchel’s consent, the museum temporarily covered the installation, and after negotiations soured, the project remained unfinished, where the museum continued work on the project.[33] The First Circuit ruled that while the museum’s continued work on the installation did constitute a genuine issue of material fact as a modification under VARA, the covering of the work under tarps was not a distortion nor a modification.[34] In dicta, the Second… [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Briefs here: Opening Brief Answer Brief Reply Brief Lower court materials here. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The First Department affirms.The case is Salemi v Gloria's Tribeca Inc., decided on March 20. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:22 pm
MapQuest, Inc. v.CIVIX-DDI, LLC, 2009 WL 383476 (N.D. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:11 pm
--Tootill v Securitas Security Servs USA, Inc., Dconn, August 16, 2010: Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted because the plaintiff could not demonstrate that a genuine issue of material fact existed over whether the employer’s reason for terminating him was pretextual. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Judge Seeherman's concurring opinion in Baik deserves a thoughtful reading, as do her subsequent comments in In re Marriott Int'l, Inc., Serial Nos. 78489804 and 78489829 (November 23, 2007) [not precedential] [TTABlogged here] and in In re Curlin Medical Inc., Serial No. 78560314 (February 11, 2008) [not precedential] [TTABlogged here] .Judge Seeherman's dissent in In re Builder's Best, Inc., Serial No. 76642671 (April 30,2008) [not precedential],… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:34 am
The Commission decided in favor of Baker, but on Monday, in Hands on Originals, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:27 am
"]December 7, 2022 - 11 AM: In re International Fruit Genetics, LLC, Serial No. 88710987 [Refusal to register COTTON CANDY for various food products on the ground of mere descriptiveness and, as to some of the identified goods, likelihood of confusion with the  identical mark registered for bubble gum and ice cream.]December 8, 2022 - 10 AM: In re Panini America, Inc., Serial No. 90004362 [Section 2(d) refusal of KABOOM! [read post]