Search for: "Robert S. Russell"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
Roberts Jr. joined this month with the Court’s liberal justices in rulings over sharp dissents from his conservative colleagues on two of the Court’s perennially divisive issues: abortion rights and capital punishment,” “reversing his previous positions on the issues — not necessarily because of a change of mind but because of a need to enforce the Supreme Court’s precedents on a renegade federal court of appeals. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:09 am
Posted by , on Friday, February 22, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of February 15-21, 2019. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Sharon Driscoll discusses the decision with law professor Robert Weisberg. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on December 10, 2018,, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on The American Legion v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Many of the citations deal with eminently practical matters, but the courts have also thought it beneficial to call upon the philosophers for a variety of more strictly “philosophic” notions, for example, Thomas Aquinas on the doctrine of free will, and Bertrand Russell on logical constructions. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
” At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “[t]hough Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a dissent from Ginsburg’s 2017 decision [in Moore’s favor], he voted with the majority Tuesday, releasing a short concurring opinion that said the Texas court ‘repeated the same errors that this Court previously condemned. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:18 am
See, e.g., Randal S. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Robert P. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 6:06 pm
Nieves encountered respondent Russell Bartlett at the party and attempted to speak with him, but Bartlett declined to talk to Nieves. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:50 am
Moren 713-368-6550 Clerk: Nidia S. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 pm
Robert Pirsig called these “gumption traps. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
” Alexander Chemers and Robert Roginson discuss the opinion at Ogletree Deakins. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 5:15 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito probed closely on the textual support for and policy implications of Bland’s position. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:38 am
” Additional coverage of yesterday’s orders comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Campaign Finance National: “How a Little-Known Democratic Firm Cashed in On the Wave of Midterm Money” by Michelle Ye Hee Lee and Anu Narayanswamy for Washington Post Connecticut: “Under the Influence: Marijuana industry seeks ruling on legality of political contributions in Connecticut” by Neil Vigdor for Hartford Courant Montana: “Montana’s Dark Money Detective” by Jimmy Tobias for Pacific Standard Elections California: “Supreme Court Rules… [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
• Robert E. [read post]
