Search for: "Rodger "Doe" Results 321 - 340 of 441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:41 am by Carolina Bracken
Lord Rodger also raises an intriguing point of statutory interpretation. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
He began by summarising the principles that apply whenever a claimant seeks an anonymity order or other restraint on publication of details of a case that would normally be in the public domain: (1) The general rule is that the names of the parties to an action are included in orders and judgments of the court. (2) There is no general exception for cases where private matters are in issue. (3) An order for anonymity or any other order restraining the publication of the normally reportable details of… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
(8) An anonymity order or any other order restraining publication made by a Judge at an interlocutory stage of an injunction application does not last for the duration of the proceedings but must be reviewed at the return date. (9) Whether or not an anonymity order or an order restraining publication of normally reportable details is made, then, at least where a judgment is or would normally be given, a publicly available judgment should normally be given, and a copy of the consequential… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:46 am by Donna
And for those who don’t know, contract lawyering does not count as legal experience. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
D2 was initially adamant that she did not want any details about the relationship to become public, saying: “I just want to be left alone as much as he [C1] does”. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am by Matthew Flinn
As recently as January 2010, Lord Rodger stated in In re Guardian News and Media Limited [2010] 2 WLR 325 that on the existing Strasbourg case law, a right to obtain any information which would not be otherwise available to a person “is not within the scope of Article 10(1)”. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:38 am
One exception, however is that such a Certificate does not excuse the impact of the conviction with respect to such an individual's right to retain, or be eligible for, public office. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
  His website bio lists no date of birth, but does show he graduated from UCLA with his B.A. in 1968. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:50 am by Adam Wagner
Belt and braces Although the decision was unanimous, Lords Rodger and Clarke added their own reasoning. [read post]