Search for: "Rodriguez v State of New York" Results 321 - 340 of 376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
In summarizing what happened, we’re experimenting with a new format. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980), the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Nor was there any disparity between the seasoning and quality of the parties’ legal teams; both parties were represented by firms at the apex of the New York matrimonial lawyer hierarchy. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Elgindy, No. 064081 In a case where racketeering conspiracists ran a subscription website recommending stock short-sales on the basis of misappropriated information: 1) venue was proper where seven site subscribers resided in the Eastern District of New York; 2) the misappropriated law enforcement reports were not public in any practical sense, even if some of the sources from which they were compiled could be accessed by the public; and 3) the district court properly included the… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Josh Blackman
(I am co-counsel with Becket in a different case challenging New York's lockdown measures). [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
However, if the State were to adopt Model Rule 8.4(g), its provisions raise serious concerns about the constitutionality of the restrictions it would place on members of the State Bar and the resulting harm to the clients they represent. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am by Lana Ulrich
A new lawsuit, however, has been filed by the D.C. and Maryland attorneys general, D.C. and Maryland v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” The editorial board of The New York Times worries that “[u]nder Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. the court has given big business a leg up on workers, unions, consumers and the environment — and will do so even more aggressively” if Kavanaugh is confirmed. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5 th Circuit initially rejected that argument, but after the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Debra Perlin
Impermissible outside influences include both attempts at witness tampering and juror animus, such as in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am by Adam Faderewski
He received his law degree from New York University School of Law and was admitted to the Texas Bar in 1978. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
”   [via Lexisone] Manuel Antonio Rodriguez v. [read post]