Search for: "S. P., individually" Results 321 - 340 of 15,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Unfortunately, there are some individuals within the business community who seek to reverse the effects of the Castellanos ruling through legislative action. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
[Secondary Conditions] […] I/P Engine’s argument that the commercial success of Google’s accused advertising systems provides objective evidence of non-obviousness. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
To take perhaps the most striking example, in 1999 an individual identified in the proceedings as “P” received a caution for stealing a sandwich from a shop. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The common denominator in the unconstitutional Castellanos statute and the unconstitutional medical malpractice statute is that each favors business interests over the rights of individuals. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
Section 75 allows an individual against whom disciplinary charges have been filed to be suspended without pay for up to 30 days. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 11:01 am
Instead, the statute simply requires the development of an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) for each student with a disability and then imposes a series of administrative and judicial devices for resolving disputes about the content and implementation of a student's IEP. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes some of the plaintiff’s concerns: all [] [D]efendants acted with malice against [] [P]laintiff who is a member of a protected class “LGBTQ” as a self-identified gay individual, causing [] [P]laintiff to suffer monetary damages including loss of employment, and a wrongful suspension of his dental practicing privileges in Washington State and is serving to deprive him of future employment as a license practice practitioner… [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:00 am by admin
In this case, an individual found liable last year by the Ontario Superior Court to pay a $500,000 “administrative monetary penalty” or “AMP” for misleading advertising appealed the lower court’s judgment (see: here). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 5:56 am
Today, 60% of S&P 1500 companies have separate individuals serving as chair and CEO, more than doubling the 27% that separated the roles in 2000. [read post]