Search for: "S. R.C. T."
Results 321 - 340
of 520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
** Much to the victim's displeasure, the judge didn't really let him use pepper spray on Gaston but ordered a saline solution instead. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
The Statute Isn’t R.C. 3701.17 more protective with regard to the information contained in these health documents, asked Chief Justice O’Connor? [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:17 am
[T]he constitutional right to jury trial may only be waived if done knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:58 am
Judge Scott Gwin dissented on this point, agreeing with the trial court that the signing bonus is passive income under R.C. 3105.171(B)(4), and thus solely Kuhn’s separate property. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:52 am
Didn’t the driver also honk to get the child’s attention? [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Or former Justice Cupp’s in Kaminski. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The court isn’t bound by the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
What about R.C. 3319.081, which governs Stewart’s employment—doesn’t that preclude his right to request a public pre-termination hearing, as the appeals court found, asked Chief Justice O’Connor? [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
L.P. didn’t make the statements to create evidence. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:05 am
Isn’t all t [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State’s Proposed Counter Proposition of Law The R.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
Case Background Jerry and Nancy Dillon’s Mercury Milan collided with a deer. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 2:41 pm
R.C. 1509.02. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
The statute in this case doesn’t protect a person’s liberty interest the way the statute did in Brown-it is more a sharing of police resources. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
What really isn’t clear to me is exactly when Pepper Pike is still applicable. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
[T]his court enunciated the policy that the exclusionary rule would not be applied to statutory violations falling short of constitutional violations, absent a legislative mandate requiring the application of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
R.C. 2945.371 The opinion next looks that the history and purpose of R.C. 2945.371, the section of the criminal code dealing with evaluations and reports of a defendant’s mental condition. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Justice Pfeifer’s dissent Pfeifer’s most significant disagreement with the majority is its failure to address the question of whether R.C. 2745.01(C) applies to non-operators injured by an employer’s removal of an equipment safety guard. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
Since, he generally hasn’t taken per se anti-death penalty stances, but has more often found that mitigating factors outweighed aggravating circumstances. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Most warnings concern a product’s use – that if you use (or don’t use) the product in a certain way, you are likely to get hurt; and if you follow the warning, you won’t. [read post]
