Search for: "SEC v. Davis"
Results 321 - 340
of 364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 3:22 am
The Court in Terry v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:29 am
[Post by Venkat, with additional comments by Eric] Facebook v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:47 pm
The Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:43 pm
The Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Field v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Finally, there was the Google/YouTube v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Making an Effective Case Directly to the TV Networks Jennifer Santos, Vice President, Ad Standards, NBC History of network challenges: 1971, FTC started encouraging comparative advertising. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
" Soverain Software LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:36 am
Pendergest-Holt v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Stephen Davis, will be seeking investor feedback on a formal recommendation to the SEC as to its potential response to the Citizens United decision. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:16 pm
Call In the Green Deal Coalition - Philadelphia LEED AP Shari Shapiro on her Green Building Law Blog Law Is Made On A Lawyer's Desk: Thoughts On The Supreme Court's Pending "Judicial Taking" Case - Philadelphia lawyer Maxwell Kennerly of The Beasley Firm at his blog, Litigation & Trial Never Underestimate the Value of Face Time: Kersey v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
Records, Inc., and UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
This post is based on a Davis Polk & Wardwell client memorandum by Joel M. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
See 17 U.S.C. sec. 512(g). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:23 am
(EDITOR’S UPDATE: The recent decision of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
References: DOJ: US v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Tomko , No. 05-4997 Sentence for tax evasion is confirmed where: 1) the the district court did not commit procedural error at sentencing, as the record shows the district court did not fail to meaningfully consider the 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553(a) factor of general deterrence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant, as the court conducted a thorough analysis of the sec. 3553(a) factors and gave logical reasons for the variance from the sentencing guidelines… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 08, 2009 Davis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:29 pm
The SEC case is Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
