Search for: "SMITH v. DAVIS"
Results 321 - 340
of 693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Colorado law); Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
See the comments of Laidlaw J.A. in Davis v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
Ferguson of Davis & Cannon, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Parke Davis & Co., 520 F.2d 1359, 1362 (4th Cir. 1975). [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:43 pm
Davis v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly held that the alleged instructional error was harmful and that Davis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Davis, 326 F.3d 361 (2nd Cir. 2003)(same). [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
The aspects of the contingency fee retainer agreement prepared by defendants and signed by plaintiff that allegedly render it noncompliant with 22 NYCRR 1215.1 do not bar defendants from recovering in quantum meruit (see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-64 [2007]; see also Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [2008]). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:07 am
Ake v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:47 pm
"] In Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Davis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
Davis, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Nos. 09-99012, 09-99013 (Ikuta with NR Smith and Murguia) --- Finding that a reasoned opinion of the California Supreme Court regarding a California death-row prisoner's claim of penalty-phase ineffective assistance was entitled to deference under AEDPA, the panel reversed the district court's grant of relief from a death sentence. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:56 am
See also Davis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
At Alison Frankel’s On the Case blog for Thomson Reuters News & Insight, Erin Geiger Smith reports on stalled progress of efforts by legislators to roll back the Court’s ruling in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
App. 1999); Smith v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
We asked the 2018-19 Davis Fellows the following question: how has your time at the Davis Center led to new insights about the reach and limits of law and legalities? [read post]
