Search for: "STANLEY V JUSTICE" Results 321 - 340 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Cricket Lighters, 841 A.2d 1000 (Pa. 2003), three justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opined that a quarter century had proven wanting the “strict liability” of the Azzarello sort, and that Pennsylvania law should move to the negligence-based standard of §2. 841 A.2d at 1015-16. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
An authority for this proposition was Bowater v NW London Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] IRLR 331, where Stanley Burnton LJ said: The appellant’s conduct was rightly made the subject of disciplinary action. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Lord Justice Ward has, over the years, sat on many notable defamation and privacy appeals. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
  Professional representation in these cases helps insure that justice is served. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:37 pm by Scott Bomboy
” The Supreme Court upheld the men’s convictions, but Justice Stanley F. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:53 am
  On the other side, the lead author of an amicus brief for the trial lawyers was former Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Stanley G. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:02 am
Justice Thomas to Federalist Society: 'What Happened to My Life? [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
-based attorney Stanley Woodward, who recently made headlines after he reportedly alleged prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Bratt. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Aitken of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting at Ottawa, Wellman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:28 pm
 Monday's decision in Kapruski v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the notorious 1959 Roncarelli v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:26 am by William Ford
David Kimball-Stanley summarized the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm the lower court’s dismissal of Fields v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dirito v Stanley, 203 AD2d 903, 904 [4th Dept 1994] [affirming dismissal of damages claim for emotional pain and suffering]; Wolkstein v Morgenstern, 275 AD2d 635, 637 [1st Dept 2000] ["A cause of action for legal malpractice does not afford recovery for any item of damages other than pecuniary loss so there can be no recovery for emotional or psychological injury"]). [read post]