Search for: "STAPLES v. STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
" * * * Romney is an inflexible opponent of the DREAM Act; he's palling around with Pete Wilson and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach; he endorses a "self-deportation" agenda; he's critical of bilingualism; and his casual dismissals of "amnesty" and "illegals" are a staple of his campaign rhetoric. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:11 pm
Staples sells a 30? [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
Title V of Division AA of the FY23 appropriations bill would provide for a registration exemption for small business mergers and acquisitions brokers by amending Exchange Act Section 15(b) to add a new subsection (13). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
And after Brown v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:21 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
22 May 2016, 8:47 am
In Hickey v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
In American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm
”[1] Which pretty succinctly states the main point of this entire series of blog posts: that human agency matters. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
Is this case, Cave v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:47 am
The case of North Carolina v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
Sch. of Law); (13) William V. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
And finally…I In that rather esoteric common law jurisdiction known as the United States of America, the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the lower court’s decision that the Universal Life Church has standing to pursue its challenge to a Tennessee law prohibiting persons who have been ordained online from solemnizing marriages: Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse v Nabors (6th Cir, May 27, 2022). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” This holding borrowed from the staple article of commerce doctrine in patent law. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
The case is Lawson v. [read post]
