Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF D B"
Results 321 - 340
of 10,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 5:51 pm
After writing yesterday's post on this story about a man arrested in Cedar Rapids, Iowa for allegedly driving while sniffing fumes from an aerosol can, I decided to do a little more research into glue sniffing laws in other states. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:58 pm
B. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:16 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, InVue Security Products Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Mobile Tech, Inc. d/b/a Mobile Technologies Inc. and MTI, formerly known as Merchandising Technologies, Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon, but incorporated in Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 10,062,266, (the “‘266 patent”) for a “Programmable… [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 1:56 pm
Dell, Individually, & d/b/a Magic in the Sky of Boerne, Texas, filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Miand, Inc. of LaPorte, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 5,184,437 for the mark MAGIC IN THE SKY (the “Mark”). [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:31 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Pearson Education, Inc. of New York, New York filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Christopher Deiter d/b/a www.easynotecards.com of Indianapolis, Indiana infringed its rights of Copyright in the United States Copyright Office of Pearson Education, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
If he does, the State will put A and B to trial together; C will testify that the person in the video is B; B will have to argue that C is mistaken and that the person in the video is A. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 13 provides that if a person is being prosecuted or is serving a sentence in the Requested State for a different offense, that State may (a) temporarily surrender the person to the Requesting State solely for the purpose of prosecution, or (b) defer surrender until the proceedings are concluded and the sentence served. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:21 pm
’, there is no Plan B. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:18 am
J-B Weld Co., No. 3:19-cv-1434 (JAM), 2024 WL 4117244 (D. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 7:52 am
The terminal disclaimer must disclaim the entire term or any terminal part of the term of the patent; (iii) State the present extent of the disclaimant's ownership interest in the patent. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
Here's the court of appeals case info if you're interested. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
If the state chooses to intervene, the state attorney general commandeers the prosecution of the tax FCA action and the whistleblower retains a financial reward interest in any successful FCA claim.4 If the state attorney general does not prosecute or dismiss the tax FCA action, the relator is permitted to continue to prosecute the case on the state’s behalf.5 Generally, in a state tax FCA action, the plaintiff—whether the relator or… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 7:54 pm
The New York State Insurance Department has just released its proposed regulatory agenda for the first half of 2009. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 1:14 pm
(a) To assist with the identification of common interest developments, each association, whether incorporated or unincorporated, shall submit to the Secretary of State, on a form and for a fee not to exceed thirty dollars ($30) that the Secretary of State shall prescribe, the following information concerning the association and the development that it manages: (1) A statement that the association is formed to manage a common interest development under the… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The application for provisional arrest shall contain: (a) a description of the person sought; (b) the location of the person sought, if known; (c) a brief statement of the facts of the case, including, if possible, the time and location of the offense; (d) a description of the laws violated; (e) a statement of the existence of a warrant of arrest or a finding of guilt or judgment of conviction against the person sought; and (f) a statement that a request for extradition for the… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be an extraditable offense whether or not (a) the laws in the two States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or (b) the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation, or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or foreign… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:44 pm
” In response to the Commission’s request, Google filed a five page submission arguing that nothing in the complaint, or in other publicly available information, suggested that Complainant ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies’ (“ChriMar”) or its licensee can meet the demand for the wireless communication products it seeks to exclude and, as a result, issuing an exclusion order against the accused products “could severely harm the… [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 8:18 am
In so holding, the court rejected the argument that a hypothetical future divergence in LRN’s and the directors’ interests was relevant at this stage, stating “LRN hypothetically ceasing indemnification in the future does not mean that LRN’s and the directors’ interests are not currently aligned in the issues presented by the complaint. [read post]
