Search for: "STATE v LANCE"
Results 321 - 340
of 442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 10:20 am
Hoffman La Roche, Inc., 618 N.W.2d 827, 840 (Neb. 2000); Lance v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
(relisted after the October 12, October 26, November 2 and November 9 conferences) Lance v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:56 am
” We are compelled to remind you of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling in Lance v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 7:03 am
The case was Lance v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
This conclusion is in fact also prompted by the following consideration: if, on the one hand, we accept that solutions like the one of the Dutch Supreme Court in Kecofa v Lancôme, ie that copyright could vest in a perfume, may not be tolerated then, on the other hand, protection could not be denied in a certain work just because it does not belong to one of the categories envisaged by a certain Member State’s list of protectable works. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Sanders and Reynolds v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm
Lance Hill accuses MGM, Amazon Studios, and United Artists of copyright infringment. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:43 am
As of today, this case arguably represent the most sophisticated and explicit use of EU pre-emption by the Court and – in even more express terms – by AG Wathelet in his Opinion [here].In the present case, should the CJEU decide to follow the Opinion of its AG, this would mean that an approach like the one adopted by the Dutch Supreme Court in Kecofa v Lancôme (in which copyright was found to subsist in the smell of a perfume) would not be allowed.Is… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
See Lance Cole, “The Fifth Amendment and Compelled Production of Personal Documents After United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:31 pm
Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:07 am
” Lujan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 5:52 pm
In the abortion-protest context, the Supreme Court in Hill v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:35 pm
” United States v. [read post]
