Search for: "STATE v PIERRE" Results 321 - 340 of 453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 10:13 am by NBlack
State of Florida, No. 4D12-556 (required judge, who was Facebook “friends” with the prosecutor in a case pending before the judge, to recuse himself.) [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:30 am by Paul Jacobson
It is entirely plausible that commercial expression could be protected under this right and we have seen this in cases like Print Media South Africa and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another which dealt with an amendment to the Films and Publications Act which established criteria for ratings for sexual and other content. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  He also considers the direction of the CRTC under a new commissioner a year on from the expiry of former Chair Jean-Pierre Blais’ tenure. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode)   United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Cybersecurity of the Person, First Amendment Law Review, 2019, Jeff Kosseff, United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Canada had a new minister of justice, Pierre Elliott Trudeau. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(Kluwer Patent Blog) Valuing a diluted brand: the Pierre Cardin challenge (IP finance) EPO – Amendments possibly inadmissible in appeal proceedings if not filed during first instance proceedings: Kone Corporation (patentee) v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:14 am by John Floyd
The Fifth Circuit explained why the district court was correct:   “In Pierre v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:05 am by Terry Hart
But that meant it had to figure out a way to state it in a manner that courts could apply. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
This week will see the State Opening of Parliament. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm by Michael Oykhman
Pierre stated that evidence of your name on the original appearance notices provides at least some evidence that you were required to attend. [read post]