Search for: "STATE v. BRENTS"
Results 321 - 340
of 565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
In Madison v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Kindred Nursing Centers v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Brent is a particular type of crude oil, as well as a leading international benchmark for oil prices. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Banister v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 9:32 am
District Judge Susan Illston ruled yesterday (Wild Equity Institute v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Wells noted the opening of a week-long hearing in the military commission case, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am
” Bill Mears reports for Fox News that the case “is part of a larger effort by red states to pass laws regulating abortion to test how supportive the new justices will be of precedents like Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:53 pm
Outdoor Council v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:30 pm
LP v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:33 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Scott Calvert report that “[t]he Supreme Court is facing a sensitive choice on whether to intervene in a partisan battle over Pennsylvania’s congressional map,” noting that “[t]he state court based its ruling on the Pennsylvania Constitution, a move that would normally leave the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:37 pm
Trinko and Credit Suisse v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
She then instructed solicitors ho made further representations, including that it had been held that the benefits cap “indirectly discriminated against women over men” (citing the Supreme Court decision in R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 21, [2019] 1 WLR 3289). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 2:26 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
However, the Ninth Circuit appeals court decided in a 2018 case also involving U.S. commodities laws in foreign markets (Stoyas v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
