Search for: "STATE v. HEAD"
Results 321 - 340
of 14,812
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
Simon Hoare, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (and, we learned, the Government’s Minister for Faith), replied. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
What the Master of the Rolls says under this heading is unacceptable for four reasons. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:14 pm
From today's report and recommendation in Koppel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and AR NAACP v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The State Law Libraries Outreach Initiative to strengthen the ties between the Law Library of Congress and state law libraries continues. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
” Cunniff states the report’s bottom line as follows: “After an objective analysis, the reviewer concluded that the Sagadahoc County Sheriff’s Office’s responses to concerns about Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
From Doe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Park v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
In relation to the two newly appointed judges: Karen Steyn was born in South Africa and brought up in Kent, where she attended local state schools before studying history at the University of Liverpool and taking the Graduate Diploma in Law at City University. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:44 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
Sunder Energy, LLC recently sought to enforce a non-compete agreement against its former head of sales in the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm
Browne v Dunn Rears Its Head Against this, the defendant’s case suffered from a tendency to attempt to produce inadmissible hearsay, and contravention of the ancient tripwire Browne v Dunn, a case from 1893 that requires litigants to put statements of fact to opposing witnesses in cross-examination if the litigant later intends to claim that the statement of fact contradicts the testimony of the opposing witness. [read post]
