Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd."
Results 321 - 340
of 488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 5:11 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea, LG Innotek Co., Ltd. of South Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 10:56 am
Co., Ltd., 839 F.3d 1034, 1051 (Fed. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 19-101 (reviewing jury verdict and 7th Amendment) Arunachalam v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
Also mentioned was the tdecision issued by the District Court of the Hague in the consolidated cases Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Maxperian NL BV and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Digital Revolution BV [ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2016:14383, para 4.74], which held that toner cartridges can be protected under Community Design rights because they are not component parts of a complex product (MARQUES Class 99 post).Common practice for LOC… [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:28 am
K-Pop icons such as Psy, whose ‘Gangnam Style’ hit went viral in 2012, and even Korean food are used by Seoul to build South Korea’s brand, while Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. and Hyundai Motor Co. are firms with global reach…. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:20 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:26 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Sharp Corporation (“Sharpâ€) and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case No.: II-CV-01846-LHK, Slip Op. at 19 (N.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:01 pm
That honor had previously been held by Samsung Electronics Company, a Korean manufacturer of dynamic random access memory (DRAM). [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/DZsJJ1JQeA -> CASL Anti-Spam Legislation – Will it Actually Halt Spam https://t.co/Zys0ALSlbj -> Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is OSRAM GmbH (“OSRAM”) and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung LED Co., Ltd., and Samsung LED America, Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
(see chart below World Wide Ownership of US Patents 2010) Top-50 US Patent Assignees in 2010 (As reported by IFI) International Business Machines Corp 5896 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (Korea) 4551 Microsoft Corp 3094 Canon K K (Japan) 2552 Panasonic Corp (Japan) 2482 Toshiba Corp (Japan) 2246 Sony Corp (Japan) 2150 Intel Corp 1653 LG Electronics Inc (Korea) 1490 Hewlett-Packard Development Co L P 1480 … [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
South Korea-based Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
WSJ Patent wars: Apple Inc. has launched a new legal attack on Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., granting injunction https://t.co/6njNVOYQ7X -> VCC appeals trademark case ruling involving use of trade marks as keywords http://t.co/xpRxzHHKqn -> [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:10 am
Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
According to the Order, Complainant Samsung LED Co., Ltd. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 3:47 am
Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, et al. (06/21/2007, non-precedential): appeal of reduced fees & cost award (this particular appeal in the string of intellectual property litigation is not patent-specific)Bender v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:59 pm
The defendants which include Nokia, AT&T Inc and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd are accused of misrepresenting that their cell phones are safe, when they in fact knew of potential dangers. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
Shanghai Huaqin Communication Technology Co. [read post]
