Search for: "Savage v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 514
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
Ever since the notion of an operational duty was first enunciated in Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, it has become something of a judicial mantra that the threshold for establishing a “real and immediate” threat was high (see for example Re Officer L [2007] UKHL 36, and Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681 [41] and [66],). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
No. 40145/98)]; residents of a slum that was engulfed by a methane explosion from a neighbouring tip [Oneryildiz v Turkey (2004) 41 EHRR 20l]; and a local authority moving an elderly resident between care homes [Watts v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 66]. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:23 am by Nabiha Syed
With the Court’s winter recess underway, commentators continue their discussion of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
At Cato@Liberty, Trevor Burrus predicts that the Court will summarily reverse the Montana Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the state’s ban on independent expenditures by corporations – a ruling that Burrus calls an attempt to “nullify” Citizens United. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am by Kiran Bhat
Federal Election Commission, in which a federal district court upheld a federal ban on campaign contributions by foreigners, as limiting the scope of Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
It all comes from, I would argue, this right to privacy that doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold — Griswold was the contraceptive case — and abortion. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
  The Associated Press (via the Washington Post) and David Savage of the Los Angeles Times both preview Sackett v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
United States, a case about the harmless error standard. [read post]