Search for: "Sell v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,724
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
On July 7, 2011, the Humane Society of the United States and United Egg Producers announced that they would “work together to seek a federal law that would require larger cages and other improved conditions for the nation’s 280 million laying hens. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 7:58 pm
His dissenting opinion concludes:The previously "narrow" border search exception, United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:02 am
In Rath v Marcoski, 2016 WL 7104872 (M.D. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:52 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am
Respondent also sells flowers, as a wholesaler of fresh cut flowers for the United States market. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 9:09 am
For purposes of this discussion, we can assume that if the product were made in the U.S. following the process that was employed in China, the production would infringe the patent.The question here involves the definition of infringement in 35 USC 271(g), which states (with my emphasis):Whoever without authority imports into the United States or offers to sell, sells, or uses within the United States a product which is made by a process… [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:20 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States in Shelley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Even so, the fact that the United States government is looking for vendors to sell it software vulnerabilities isn’t news—we’ve known for some time that the government uses software vulnerabilities, sometimes known as zero-days, for offensive intelligence-gathering and espionage. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
United States, suggests that consideration of future tax ramifications for professional services providers that incorporate and subsequently sell their practices are now necessary. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:43 pm
In the United States, the inventor also gets a one-year grace period before the on-sale bar applies. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:43 pm
In the United States, the inventor also gets a one-year grace period before the on-sale bar applies. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
" The indictment in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
The complaint alleges that Gallo obtained the Spanish company’s agreement not to sell its goods in the United States and Puerto Rico. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm
Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
United States, the Supreme Court wrestled with how to make sense of what went on behind closed doors in a jury deliberation that produced several acquittals but also deadlocked on other factually related counts. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
After Timbs and his attorney filed suit, his case went from Indiana state court all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
