Search for: "Sellers v. Head"
Results 321 - 340
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
Whoever gonna help me, bracha [blessing] on his head. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:26 am
Moody and NetChoice v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am
’)” Moseley v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
It doubles down on the “any market” issue—first, by marrying an express concern with labor-market effects with likely (or perhaps merely potential) impact on competition “in any line of commerce and in any section of the country,” (emphasis in original–that is, in the guidelines, not the Clayton Act) and, second, by stating that “a merger’s harm to competition among buyers is not saved by benefits to competition among sellers. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
There are all sorts of info problems, including overproduction, reciprocity problems (seller worried about giving poor rating out of fear of getting poor rating), asymmetry, information that is out of date (right to be forgotten), etc. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
If P&G is promoting a diaper v. if it’s the content created by P&G that you’re promoting. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
State has no legit interest in telling you (food seller) to put that message on food. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
The authority of the decision maker is critical.[15] Cost or pricing data are limited to information a reasonably prudent buyer or seller would expect to affect price negotiations significantly.[16] This is a “reasonable person” standard. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
Lopez, Head of COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit, advising Miracle Star that it was required to maintain participant records in accordance with state laws, to maintain reports, studies, statistical surveys, or other information to determine and allocate indirect costs, and to make these records available to COLA representatives for a fiscal audit. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
‘‘(v) NARROWEST POSSIBLE SCOPE OFEXCEPTION. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:26 am
As the number of transactional options continues to grow, so does the risk for potential buyers, sellers, traders and investors. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am
When the seller isn’t going anywhere, and nobody else is likely to buy the property, then you can wait. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:04 pm
The case that came the closest was Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Koch was administrative head of Paul Hastings' real estate group. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm
In the afternoon roundtable, one participant claimed that Hassell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:22 pm
(Source: InterOil Special Projects Manager Neil Dolinsky affidavit from Zeigler v Dolan et al).On April 24, 2008, Clarion Finanz entered into a separate Investment Banking Consulting Agreement with Carey International for its role in helping Clarion Finanz raise funds for InterOil. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The case of Epic Games v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Here is the provision:Fair and equitable66.501 The Board shall fix royalty and levy rates and any related terms and conditions under this Act that are fair and equitable, in consideration of(a) what would have been agreed upon between a willing buyer and a willing seller acting in a competitive market with all relevant information, at arm’s length and free of external constraints;(b) the public interest;(c) any regulation made under subsection 66.91(1);… [read post]