Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 3,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2019, 8:48 am by Kevin Kaufman
Texas already collects sales tax from many larger remote sellers who have a physical presence in the state, but in the wake of South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am by Daithí
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:17 pm by Valerie Sasaki
Since then, lawmakers in dozens of states have proposed or introduced versions of the South Dakota law that attempt to tax remote sellers. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:28 am by Charles Sartain
It unambiguously stated that they were selling all of their mineral interests. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 3:25 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Under the Regulations, sellers must give consumers, at the point the contract is concluded, written notice of their right to cancel. [read post]