Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 321 - 340
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 12:04 pm
Matetsky, Derek Muller, Allen Pulsifer, Steve Rappoport, Daniel Tilley, Seth Barrett Tillman, Hanah Metchis Volokh, Sasha Volokh, and Jeff Walden for their advice and beta testing. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 1:34 pm
Here is the abstract: In this essay, I respond to a debate between Geoffrey Stone, Seth Barrett Tillman, Alan Brownstein, and others about the complex relationships between the authors of the 1787 Constitution, contemporaneous religious practices and beliefs, and the enterprise of constitutional interpretation and textual exegesis. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:21 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman has posted Originalism, the Annals of Congress, and the Problem of Constitutional Memory. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:09 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman (United States District Court, NJ) has posted Originalism, the Annals of Congress, and the Problem of Constitutional Memory on SSRN. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:20 am
Seth Barrett Tillman proposes to solve this puzzle by reading "displace" as "replace" rather than "remove. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:03 am
Seth Barrett Tillman (United States District Court, PA) has posted Blushing Our Way Past History (Cardozo Law Review de novo, Vol. 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Seth Barrett Tillman has posted Blushing Our Way Past Historical Fact And Fiction: A Response to Professor Geoffrey R. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
SETH BARRETT TILLMAN: The Puzzle of Hamilton’s Federalist No. 77: It Turns out Hamilton was Right After All. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
Seth Barrett Tillman (United States District Court, PA) has posted The Puzzle of Hamilton's Federalist No. 77: It Turns Out Hamilton Was Right after All on SSRN. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:56 pm
In conjunction with this colloquy, we republished a series of essays by Seth Barrett Tillman and Brian C. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
But Cf. the various works of Seth Barrett Tillman, who argues in a number of articles that a full Congress now could delegate to a post-attack Congress the power to enact legislation through only one house (the Senate, reconstituted via appointments) in the interim. ** There is an open question of constitutional quorums here. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:43 pm
SETH BARRETT TILLMAN AND STEVE CALABRESI DEBATE the constitutional status of Presidents and Vice Presidents. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:45 am
Stephen Bigler (Richards, Layton & Finger) & Seth Barrett Tillman (United States District Court, PA) have posted Void or Voidable? [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:40 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman, An "Utterly Implausible" Interpretation of the Constitution: A Reply to Professor Steven G. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 11:33 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman has posted Why Our Next President May Keep His or Her Senate Seat: A Conjecture on the Constitution's Incompatibility Clause on SSRN. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 5:06 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman -- one of the best constitutional law professors not to be a law professor -- argues in this recent paper that McCain, Clinton, and Obama may keep their Senate seats even assuming that one of them becomes President. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 6:15 am
Seth Barrett Tillman has posted Void or Voidable? [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 11:13 pm
A prior article co-authored by Seth Tillman was previously posted on here. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:20 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman & Nora Rotter Tillman have posted A Fragment on Shall and May (forthcoming 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Franklin Balotti & Seth Barrett Tillman have posted Gazing into the Crystal Ball of Future Developments in Delaware Corporate Law: What If the Past is Not Prologue? [read post]
