Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice" Results 321 - 340 of 515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
  An exception was a post on the “Mirror of Justice” blog entitled “Military Funerals and the Failure of Chief Justice Roberts”. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On INFORRM Oliver Fairhurst has covered the case of Magyar Jeti Zrt v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sharp LJ refused the application for permission to appeal in the case of Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In a recent case between Glassdoor, an online job-review website, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) an Arizona Judge has ruled that the DOJ can compel a private company to give up someone’s private information because they expressed an opinion online. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 7:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy most recent Verdict column discusses Tuesday's SCOTUS oral argument in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
But this Court can only look to the questions, whether the laws have been violated; and if they were, justice demands, that the injured party should receive a suitable redress. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am by David Pozen
  Last fall, President Trump announced he was preparing an executive order that would deny birthright citizenship to children born in the United States to parents unlawfully in the country, notwithstanding the Justice Department’s consistent stance that such a move would violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:53 am by Russ Bensing
  Sharp readers — and do I have any other kind? [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The rules came into force in 2010 at the same time that Mr Justice Birss (as he now is) was appointed to the Patents County Court (PCC). [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] This is the same approach employed by Justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Freedom of Information The judgement in the case of  Department of Health v Information Commissioner & Lewis [2017] EWCA Civ 374) has been published. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm by Jennifer Granick
Additionally, the Department of Justice argues that under the current law, messages are unprotected if they are opened, read, or in the trash or drafts folder. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 11:19 am by Timothy Edgar
Although it is a close call, the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog also has a summary of a recent roundtable hosted by the LSE Department for Media and Communication on the key issues of the draft Online Safety Bill. [read post]