Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 321 - 340
of 515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 8:36 pm
The Court’s docket indicates that the Justices will consider whether to grant the petitions in Moores v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Halbig v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
If the Court had adopted several of Justice Alito's propositions as holdings, then Hobby Lobby would, indeed, have been a dramatic development, and a sharp departure from decades of law, with potentially serious ramifications. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
One imagines, by contrast, that the Justices had a harder time seeing themselves in Fernandez’s shoes, trying to block the police from seeing physical evidence of a crime against a backdrop of sharp domestic conflict. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Harris and KBR v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
To the best of our knowledge, there is no explanation of the circumstances requiring these ordinances published on the websites of the President’s Secretariat, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Department of Telecommunications nor the Ministry of Law and Justice as on the date of the writing of this note. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:37 pm
Today's opinion in Bond v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
In 1980 he was presiding over the Catholic diocese of El Quiché, the department in the western highlands where the guerrillas first began to boast that indigenous peasants were supporting them. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
We all know Justice Thomas’ answer – but he is an extremist on the issue. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Canada-Cameroon BIT signing; photo from DFATD In Hupacasath First Nation v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
There was a vigorous anti-trust attack on the patent system through the Department of Justice. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
The Court, as it had done in the Seventh Circuit case, asked the Justice Department for its views on Argentina’s challenge. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
A National Institute of Justice study by Douglas McDonald and Kenneth Carlson found much higher cost savings. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:58 am
” The Court’s reasoning drew sharp criticism from Justice Sonia Sotomayor (above left). [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Presiding Justices of the First Second Third & Fourth Departments, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of State of New York, 488 F. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
To never -- and I mean, never -- knowingly depart from the law. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
Alvarez, and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice articulated this constitutional right in the clearest voice yet, when they intervened in Sharp v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
Officer Robert Chavez of the Deming Police Department sought the search warrant. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:59 pm
The Justices, rather than accepting for review any version of the question posed by the challengers, instead posed its own version, but in doing so borrowed almost exactly the language used by the Justice Department in a brief that summed up the issues raised in the case. [read post]
