Search for: "Sinclair v. Sinclair"
Results 321 - 340
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
Conte v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437 (17 June 2011): Court of Appeal: By 2-1 majority (Lord Justice Laws dissenting) Ban on tobacco sales through automatic vending machines was lawful. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am
When the UT(LC) had been the Lands Tribunal (i.e. from 1949-2009) it had been clear that there was no right to appeal a decision refusing permission to appeal: R (Sinclair Investments Kensington Ltd) v Lands Tribunal [2005] EWCA Civ 1305. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am
When the UT(LC) had been the Lands Tribunal (i.e. from 1949-2009) it had been clear that there was no right to appeal a decision refusing permission to appeal: R (Sinclair Investments Kensington Ltd) v Lands Tribunal [2005] EWCA Civ 1305. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:04 am
See Whitmore v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 2:24 pm
In Buchanan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
” Sinclair v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:02 am
In Sinclair Wyoming Refining Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Hollis v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
A.D. 2008); Sinclair v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
Problem 5 --In re Sinclair --Notes and Questions C. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm
* Parisi v Sinclair, another 230 case, is being appealed to the DC Circuit. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Quarmby, et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm
First, there is the Sheriff’s Court case of Sinclair or Fraser v Fraser (16 July 2010) in which Sheriff Margaret Neilson awarded damages of £5,000 in respect of oral defamatory statements by the defender about the pursuer, who had been a co-worker with Leonard Cheshire Disability. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
And in Houston v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
Sinclair v PCC 3 An owner’s entitlement to records is not restricted by whether the record is specifically identified in s. 55(1) of the Act and s. 13.1(1) of the O. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Hall v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet ALDF v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:30 pm
Under Edwards v. [read post]
