Search for: "Smith v. Canada" Results 321 - 340 of 720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Since MacDonald Estate, there has been deep consideration of solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege in the Supreme Court of Canada as can be seen from the following lengthy (and incomplete) case list: Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v Whatcott (2016 SKCA 17) the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan reduced a damages award of Can$30,000 to anti-gay campaigner to Can$1,000. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
The question of injunctions over search results came to ahead in British Columbia, Canada, nearly two years ago, in a case that will be ultimately decided on by the Supreme Court of Canada in the near future.The case of Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack dealt with Equustek Solutions' technology that allows for industrial equipment made by two separate manufacturers to communicate with each other in a variety of ways. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Canada CBC reports that Northwestel is suing Martin Lehnher of Orange Technology for libel over remarks made in a radio interview. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Charles Smith’s discrete testimony had allegedly contributed to a number of miscarriages of justice relating to infant deaths. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
Canada Internet companies and telcos are the guardians of personal privacy in this connected age. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Pre-1972 sound recordings, the copyright in performances and protecting a 'vibe' in the USA, as well as the art of photography in France, web blocking in Australia, a failed private copying exception in the United Kingdom all featured on the 1709 copyright blog, along with topics such as the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement and the ensuing changes in countries such as Canada and New Zealand, and the reform of copyright law, both in the U.S. and Europe. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada has tabled his Annual Report on the Privacy Act to Parliament for 2014-2015. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
Canada The province’s former chief medical examiner has discontinued a lawsuit she filed against former justice minister Jonathan Denis. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada A defamation trial is taking place in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, that will come to be known by the first case of the two: FERC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
Where I thought we’d be | PETA litigates over macaque selfie | JIPLIP eventNever too late 64 [week ending on Sunday 20 September] – Adwords in Canada | EU Draft consultation on ISPs | "The UPC: A Panel Debate" | Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince  Lenz v Universal Music | CJEU in KitKat | Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) | Economics of… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE * Never too late 64 - [week ending on Sunday 20 September] – Adwords in Canada | EU Draft consultation on ISPs | "The UPC: A Panel Debate" | Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince  Lenz v Universal Music | CJEU in KitKat | Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) | Economics of Collecting Societies |… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
Lange, The Doctrine of Res Judicata in Canada (Markham: Lexisnexis Canada, 2015). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am by John-Paul Boyd
This information is about your rights and your responsibilities as a self-represented litigant involved in a civil court proceeding in Canada, and what you should expect from the judges, court staff and lawyers you will meet along the way. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  As a result of the Court’s judgments in Smith v Dooley ([2013] NZCA 428), Young v TVNZ ([2014] NZCA 50) and Murray v Wishart ([2014] 3 NZLR 722, 729-731), the law in New Zealand currently seems to be that, depending on the circumstances of publication, a plaintiff may rely on other publications made subsequent to that complained of – even up to a year afterwards – to support the allegedly defamatory meanings said to arise. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
 | Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]