Search for: "Smith v. Ives" Results 321 - 340 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Sama, and Jennifer Wieboldt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Tags: Cross-border transactions, Morrison v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm by Geoff Cockrell
As part of an increased focus on compliance, the experts noted that sellers should be prepared to discuss regulatory, compliance and related business points in detail, including: (i) the handling of ePatient data/payor data; (ii) coding compared to market; (iii) reliance on reimbursement from high margin ancillary businesses; (iv) regulatory risk and (v) relationships with payors. [read post]
Department of Labor’s minimum salary threshold for exempt employees (currently $35,568 annually) with a written wage statement specifically showing (i) the number of hours worked; (ii) the rate of pay; (iii) the gross wages earned during the pay period; (iv) the amount and purpose of any deductions; and (v) information sufficient to enable the employee to determine how the gross and net pay were calculated. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:37 am by Doug Cornelius
Supreme Court’s definition of an “investment contract” in SEC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:10 am by Randall Reese
Flynn in Support of Debtors' Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Motions Filed By Summit Business Media Holding CompanyMotion of Debtors for Interim and Final Orders (I) Authorizing Post-Petition Secured Financing Pursuant to Sections 105, 361, 362, 364(c)(1), 364(c)(2), 364(d)(1), 364(e) and 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; (II) Authorizing the Debtors to Use Cash Collateral; (III) Providing Adequate Protection to the Existing First Lien Secured Parties and Existing Second Lien Lenders Pursuant… [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
[iv]   Not that kind of filter.That is the policy. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by David Kris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Amici express no opinion on the procedural questions raised in Part IV of McCauley's brief.) [read post]