Search for: "Smith v. UPS" Results 321 - 340 of 5,766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
“...EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT, PLUS THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, TOTALLY EXONERATED ME FROM THE CONTINUING WITCH HUNT BROUGHT ON BY CORRUPT JOE BIDEN, THE DOJ, DERANGED JACK SMITH, AND THEIR RADICAL LEFT, MARXIST THUGS…” --Donald Trump, June 15, 2023 The notion that presidents—and, for that matter, the rest of the federal government—must preserve their records is of recent vintage. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Nasir Mehmood v Up and Coming TV Ltd [2023] EWHC 1426 (KB) by Heather Williams J. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
But the line, having now decided that it is The Line, refuses to break up. [read post]
On 7 June 2023, Mr Justice Marcus Smith handed down judgment with his FRAND determination.[1]  This is the second judgment issued by the English Courts containing a substantive FRAND determination since the pivotal judgment of the UK Supreme Court in 2020 in Unwired Planet (the first being the judgment of Mr Justice Mellor in InterDigital v Lenovo earlier this year). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
He faces a jail term of up to 175 years for espionage. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm by Henry P Yang
This approach is consistent with the law, with support for example from a 1969 decision Smith Kline.Sir Robin finally remarked that there is no evidence that patents prevent innovation. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am by Florian Mueller
Apple FRAND determination by Mr Justice Marcus Smith (High Court of Justice, England and Wales) has been my most popular patent-related blog post in recent months. [read post]