Search for: "Snowden v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2015, 10:11 am
On Friday, he stated that Iranian policy would not change against the “arrogant” United States, in comments that Secretary of State John Kerry today deemed “disturbing. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
Two years post-Snowden the government was still acknowledging previously unknown (except to those in the know) uses of opaque statutory powers. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
None of this would have occurred but for the 2013 Snowden revelations of the scale of GCHQ’s use of bulk interception powers. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
EFF recently filed an amicus brief in Doc Society v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:01 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 am
” In the second half of his decision, Orenstein distinguishes the principle case the government appears to consistently rely on when requesting these types of orders: United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
This case joined another cellphone search case and eventually was brought before an expanded panel of the Supreme Court of Israel in the matter of Orich and others v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm
Snowden’s revelations have brought conversations about government surveillance and the right to privacy into the spotlight. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
Much post-Snowden attention has been directed to GCHQ’s TEMPORA programme, authorised (so it is thought) by a rolling series of external interception warrants under section 8(4) of RIPA. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:52 am
DEAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
Europe The European Data Protection Board published an opinion on data transfers between EU member states and Russia. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:04 am
In February, in the case of Clapper v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
(Lawfare) State of Maryland v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Oral arguments in Hatim v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
” Riley at 26-27, citing Coolidge v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
