Search for: "Sony Inc"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm
” Sony Corp. of Am. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 11:27 am
” Sony Corp. of Am. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Textron Inc., No. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:17 pm
The press release (here), which relates to Web.com Group, Inc., refers to the company’s August 18, 2015 filing with the SEC on Form 8-K. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
In this case, the plaintiffs allege that Blue Sky Studios, DremWorks Animation SKG, ImageMovers Digital, Lucasfilm, Pixar, Sony, and Disney all had a scheme not to actively solicit each other employees and that the studios engaged in “collusive discussions in which they exchanged competitively sensitive compensation information and agreed upon compensation ranges,” that would keep the salaries artificially low in the industry. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:52 am
Hellerstein, del Tribunal federal para el Distrito Sur de Nueva York emitió sus determinaciones de hecho y derecho en el caso Mayimba Music Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:52 am
Hellerstein, del Tribunal federal para el Distrito Sur de Nueva York emitió sus determinaciones de hecho y derecho en el caso Mayimba Music Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Copyright History Shyam Balganesh University of Pennsylvania Law School The Questionable Origins of the Copyright Infringement Analysis Jerome Frank’s infamous/canonical © infringement test from Arnstein v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:08 am
Given that there is no “digital border,” this also raises questions regarding when information has entered the country and links up to issues from Suprema, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:54 am
And YouTube's dominance has prompted the major labels (Universal, Sony and Warner) to start to explore ways to loosen YouTube’s grip on free ad-supported music videos - not least by supporting rival sites like Vessel and Snapchat. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
This, together with other issues, is what Arnold J had been asked to determine in Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC & Another v WPMC Ltd & Another [2015] EWHC 1853 (Ch) (1 July 2015), an intriguing case decided earlier this week, having to do with the Beatles and a documentary concerning their first US concert ever. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:33 pm
Accolade, Inc., 977 F.2d 1510, 1522 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Sony Computer Ent’mt, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
The recording Industry Associatoin of America (RIAA) claim settlement also includes ABKCO – the owner of classic Rolling Stones copyrights – and the claimants (Capitol Records LLC, Sony Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings Inc, Warner Music Group and ABKCO) have jointly been awarded $210m as part of a settlement with Sirius. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
Blair.Music Canada, despite its mis-descriptive name, actually mainly represents the interests of the big three non-Canadian multinational record companies:· Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
He then mentioned case of New Kids on the Block v News America Publishing Inc in which the defendant ran a poll to find out which member of the group New Kids on the Block was the most popular. [read post]
