Search for: "South Carolina v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of South Carolina: State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm
There Is No Federal Drug Testing Law for Private Employers in the United StatesCheck Your State - and Check With Counsel! [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:28 am
South Carolina Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Two months earlier, the French counsel in Charleston, Jean-Baptiste Perry, had sent a letter to the French Minister of Marine which described the “anguish” of South Carolina planters over the prospect that after 1808 the United States might not only “prohibit the importation of negroes,” but also “emancipate those born in this country after that time” (27 DHRC 41). [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Justice Johnson of the Supreme Court of the United States, given at the Circuit, in Charlestown, in August, 1823, in the case of Elkison v Deliesseline, in which the action of South Carolina was declared unconstitutional, in the most emphatic terms. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
(I'm not taking a position on the controversial question of statehood here), Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah (submitter), Vermont, and Washington.All of the most populous states except California--which might… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:23 am
S.790: A bill to clarify certain provisions of Public Law 103-116, the Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993, and for other purposes. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:39 pm
In 2008, South Carolina enacted a “De Facto Custodian” statute, § 63-15-60. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Belohlavek (University of South Florida, Tampa) reviews Louis P. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
The first, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am
The Fourth Circuit’s decision here leans heavily on two Supreme Court precedents involving Bivens and the military context, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
South Carolina Dep't of Corr., C/A No. 4:08-2955-CMC-TER, 2008 WL 4831484, at *1 n. 1 (D.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
United States 16-142 Issue: Whether 21 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
S. 558 (2003) and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
Green Bull then appealed to the South Carolina Court of Appeals. [read post]
