Search for: "Spelling v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 2,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2021, 11:18 am by vforberger
Response: UIPL 2-16 (1 Oct. 2015) states, in relevant part: A. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 10:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
This ruling is completely in line with the recent Delaware decisions, including for example the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:50 am by Daphne Keller
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:49 am by Daphne Keller
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
That opinion contains some law potentially relevant to the present situation: it spells out the scope of the statute and unambiguously affirms its constitutionality, in a decision cited in a major later seditious conspiracy case. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am by Andrew J. Grotto
The director will: [S]erve as the principal advisor to the President on cybersecurity policy and strategy relating to the coordination of [cyber defense, cyber-related diplomacy, understanding and deterring malicious cyber actors, and engaging with industry, among others] [§ 1752(A)] [O]ffer advice and consultation to the National Security Council and its staff, the Homeland Security Council and its staff, and relevant Federal departments and agencies, for their consideration relating to the… [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:26 am by Emanuela Tala
  The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied the requested temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and in a case titled Fulton v. [read post]
Here, we spell out some of the potential federal criminal statutes that could apply to yesterday’s conduct. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] 2 WLR 857 The case concerns the UK’s stance on the application of mutual legal assistance to the United States where doing so may result in the death penalty being carried out. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:42 am by Cyberleagle
The government has now published the Final Response to its Consultation on the April 2019 Online Harms White Paper. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 4:55 am by Sophia Tang
The Chinese villages win a lawsuit in China to repatriate a Mummified Buddha Statue hold by a Dutch Collector —What Role has Private International Law Played? [read post]