Search for: "State, in Interest of Fm"
Results 321 - 340
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2013, 6:21 pm
The United States was not invited to TPP talks until 2008. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:51 am
The Media Bureau also entered into a Consent Decree with the licensee of two Florida AM stations and three FM translator stations for a transfer of control of the licensee without FCC approval. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:10 am
The SEC succeeded in sending shockwaves through the digital asset space after it agreed to a $100 million settlement with BlockFi over BlockFi’s interest product. [read post]
28 May 2023, 7:06 am
But neither application met the FCC’s spacing requirements to other existing FM stations. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
January 31, 2020 Biennial Ownership Reports – All licensees and entities holding an attributable interest in a licensee of one or more AM, FM, TV, Class A television, and/or Low Power TV (LPTV) stations must file a biennial ownership report reflecting information as of October 1, 2019. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 11:53 pm
Their solution is not state of the art. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 7:51 am
But the debate that followed these two unrelated events seemed to throw interesting questions. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
The FMS says: One of your employees has been identified as owing a delinquent nontax debt to the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
There is considerable interest in using PRP for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, particularly athletic injuries. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 8:32 am
A public interest group has asked the Commission to require this report to gather information on the race and ethnicity of employees and senior leadership of vendors of video content to both traditional media and streaming services. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 8:04 am
” The investigation of the case had been transferred to Gem County and the Idaho State Police to prevent conflicts of interest. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:23 pm
The coalition’s Web site states that it was set up “by a group of concerned citizens to help the public contact the decision makers involved in getting permanent, comprehensive flood protection for the FM area. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 3:24 pm
For those of us who have been in the industry for quite some time, that claim is surprising, as the very first sentence of Section 73.3615, the FCC rule that governs the filing of ownership reports, states: "The Ownership Report for Commercial Broadcast Stations (FCC Form 323) must be electronically filed every two years by each licensee of a commercial AM, FM, or TV broadcast station (a "Licensee"); and each entity that holds an interest in the licensee that is… [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 7:14 am
Also, its interesting because even in this toxic political climate, this is an almost uniquely bipartisan issue. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:00 pm
The proposal is intended to support and incentivize local journalism by rewarding broadcasters’ commitment to meeting the needs and interests of their local communities. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:46 am
This proposal is meant to supplant the long-pending proposal to create a Class C4 FM station, which would be available only in certain parts of the country – the FM A10 class would be available throughout the US, potentially allowing some Class A stations to increase their power. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:42 am
The case is also interesting in that the normal fine suggested by the FCC’s table of base fines - $4000 (see the FCC order setting base fines here) – was increased to $10,000 for two reasons. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:18 am
Aug. 31, 2012) (not for publication), beginning with the plaintiff’s allegations: KPFA 94.1 FM is a nonprofit Bay Area radio station owned and operated by Pacifica. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:39 am
Public Interest Programming Reports: In a proposal released in 2011, the FCC issued a Notice of Inquiry to look at the adoption of a new form on which broadcasters would report the public interest programming that they do. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
The court then stated the length of such a restriction must be based on the best interests of the former couple’s child. [read post]
