Search for: "State of Delaware v. Shorts." Results 321 - 340 of 832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:00 pm by Gene Quinn
On May 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:52 am by Dennis Crouch
The short (10-page) unanimous opinion authored by Justice Thomas reaffirms the court’s prior decision in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
It’s true that the statutory and common-law rules at play in business divorce cases can vary widely from state to state. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:35 am
Rugani, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, on Monday, February 20, 2017 Tags: Attorneys’ fees, Charter & bylaws, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Forum selection, In re Trulia, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, New York, Settlements, Shareholder suits, State law The Corwin Effect: Stockholder Approval of M&A Transactions Posted by Steven M. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Delaware: Decision on Supermajority Bylaw May Have Broad Implications I recently blogged about the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in Frechter v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:23 am by Michelle Buhalo
And Delaware doesn't list it as an official state holiday (1 Del.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Robert Loeb
On February 2, 2017, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, issued a decision in Gordon v. [read post]