Search for: "State of Montana v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2010, 12:25 pm by WIMS
The United States Forest Service (the Service) proposed the Smith Creek Project (the Project) in the Gallatin National Forest to reduce the risk of severe wildfire, to reduce the risk of insect infestation and disease, and to promote habitat diversity. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am by Nabiha Syed
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm by Scott C. Idleman
” The first civil-law counterpart to Oliphant was issued just three years later in Montana v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
After their arrival in the United States, Ingrid and L.S. moved to Brady,  Montana, to move in with Alan. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am by Native American Rights Fund
State of Montana (Water Compacts)News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlIn the Sacred Places section, we feature articles about the Trump administration's decisions to revoke and replace Bears Ears National Monument. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am by Native American Rights Fund
State of Montana (Water Compacts)News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlIn the Sacred Places section, we feature articles about the Trump administration's decisions to revoke and replace Bears Ears National Monument. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher Michigan State University College of Law Abstract: In Michigan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: UNSR Letter of Allegation Indigenous Prisoners Religious Freedom Excerpt: A pattern of restricting American indigenous prisoners’ religious freedoms is currently occurring throughout the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:06 am by Kiran Bhat
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses the recent oral argument in Montana v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am by Unknown
McKee (Tribal Courts; Water Rights) United States v. [read post]