Search for: "State v. Accord" Results 321 - 340 of 49,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The power to tax the exercise of a privilege is the power to control or suppress its enjoyment According to the majority, the ordinance was unconstitutional because a State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On May 17, 1954 the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm by Evan M. Levow
” DWI is not considered a “crime of violence,” according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Leocal v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm by Evan M. Levow
” DWI is not considered a “crime of violence,” according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Leocal v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:54 am by tracey
eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10);  [2011] WLR (D)  330 “Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an action either before the courts of the member state in which the publisher of that content was… [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:31 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday we flagged two amicus briefs filed on behalf of the petitioner in al-Bahlul v. [read post]