Search for: "State v. Barks"
Results 321 - 340
of 381
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
The executive wages war, Congress takes to the airwaves to nip and bark at his heels, and courts rule this way or that on the tiny number of issues that survive doctrines like state secrets and sovereign immunity. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 4:06 pm
Philips v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:18 pm
This president is set forth in Bard v Jahnke, 2006. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:53 am
The Dog that Didn’t Bark: The Major Questions Doctrine The state AGs who challenge EPA’s approach argue that it violates the major questions doctrine. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:07 pm
Clearly, this applicant has learned its lesson from the decision in Animal Welfare Institute v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 2:08 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Tragically, since 2000, an average of approximately 55 police officers have been shot and killed each year in the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA's auditor also stated that Miracle Star did not provide adequate records for the audit, which caused the auditor to be unable to determine if Miracle Star had provided all specific services stated in the contract. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Animal law in Nevada: all bark and no bite. 11 Nev. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 10:56 am
In Gerstle v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
Thomas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in the Hobby Lobby case continues to reverberate in legal and political circles, with seemingly every angle of the majority’s bizarre decision being scrutinized, defended, and ridiculed. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 8:57 am
From Yelling v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:25 pm
A good faith disagreement exists between the majority in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Supreme Court decided a case, BMW of North America v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
(Campbell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:44 am
In some cases, police respond to a noise complaint such as a barking dog. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
In Meinecke v. [read post]
