Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 321 - 340
of 8,188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:50 pm
When filed, this case was seen as another chapter in the on-going battle between downwind and upwind states over cross-border pollution. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:48 pm
Child custody disputes are complex and emotionally charged legal battles that often leave both parents and children in a state of upheaval. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:03 am
In Restaurant Law Center et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:28 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
They won the battle, and then lost the war. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Texas Monthly named state Rep. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:45 am
She beat a 14-year incumbent for her spot in the United States House of Representatives, earning the nickname “Battling Bella. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
As Justice Kornreich’s decision states, since then “Belardi-Ostroy has controlled the Company and refused to hold Board meetings or agree on a fifth Director. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:48 am
Those who click on that headline will probably mostly be people who are hot for battle and hating their adversary and — because it's Reich and The Guardian and because of the incipient overruling of Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 6:56 am
In the UMG v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 6:56 am
In the UMG v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:32 am
Supreme Court’s 1962 decision in Pearlman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:58 am
This battle on summary judgment is fought deep in the weeds. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm
In some states, e.g., North Carolina, see Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Pisciotta v. [read post]
