Search for: "State v. Boots" Results 321 - 340 of 853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2012, 5:23 pm
The alleged clothes, in this case, consist of flame-retardant pants and jacket, work gloves, metatarsal boots (work boots containing steel or other strong material to protect the toes and instep), a hard hat, safety glasses, ear plugs, and a "snood" (a hood that covers the top of the head, the chin and the neck). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am by Joy Waltemath
In rejecting the employee’s claim that she was regarded as disabled, the court noted that her injury was transitory and minor and, therefore, not an impairment under the ADA (Purvis v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:30 am by Steve Vladeck
In his words, the majority opinion “as a practical matter requires States to appoint counsel in initial-review collateral proceedings—and, to boot, eliminates the pre-existing assurance of escaping federal-habeas review for claims that appointed counsel fails to present. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by William Ford
Robert Chesney dissected the most important disputes in Doe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
(That Supreme Court case, Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]