Search for: "State v. Bradley" Results 321 - 340 of 1,159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Andrew Kent examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Camp’s article A History of Tax Regulation Prior to the Administrative Procedure Act was cited in the following article: Brian Boyd, State v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Delaney, eds, Edward Elgar, UK, 2017, Forthcoming).Caroline Mala Corbin, A Free Speech Tale of Two County Clerk Refusals, (Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming).Elaine Rene Elizabeth Panter, Tanya Primiani, Tazeen Hasan & Eduardo Calderon Pontaza, Antidiscrimination Law and Shared Prosperity: An Analysis of the Legal Framework of Six Economies and Their Impact on the Equality of Opportunities of Ethnic, Religious, and Sexual Minorities, (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.… [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In an op-ed in the Washington Examiner, Bradley Smith urges the court to grant review in a campaign finance case challenging restrictions on contributions to state and local political parties, arguing that it “makes no sense to send state and local parties to the back of the bus when it comes to political campaigns. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
City of Miami and Wells Fargo v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Follow Culture Secretary Karen Bradley’s decision that she was minded to’ refer the takeover of  Sky plc by 21st Century Fox to Ofcom there have been a large number of representations supporting such a reference. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
 The Secretary of State, Karen Bradley, has written to the company [pdf] indicating that she is “minded” to issue a European Intervention Notice. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:37 pm by Amanda Pickens
Here is a recap of February’s filings: Bradley, et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]