Search for: "State v. Buckley" Results 321 - 340 of 529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm by Andrew Koppelman
BeVierChapter 12The Nine Lives of Buckley v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:51 am by Sam Favate
The proposed amendment would also reverse the 1976 decision Buckley v Valeo, which held that spending money is a form of speech in elections. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 8:26 am by WSLL
Representing Appellee (Respondent): Michael Rosenthal and Lucas Buckley, Hathaway & Kunz, P.C.; Larry H. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:28 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Shaffer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
They point out that this is 3M’s third bite at the apple — the company previously filed two similar cases in New York state court. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm by Rick Hasen
But Justice Brennan’s switch in Bellotti is not all that surprising when one considers his earlier vacillation about contributions and spending limits in the Buckley case, which I describe in my article, The Untold Drafting History of Buckley v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:49 pm by Rick Hasen
  I learned so much from his earlier work in preparing my history of Buckley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:42 pm by Joey Fishkin
This was one thread of the justification for Congress' post-Watergate attempt to impose spending limits on candidates and independent groups, which the Court struck down in Buckley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:18 am by Heather K. Gerken
Nonetheless, the only middle ground that has been found in this fight has been to stick with Buckley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:27 am by Sean Wajert
Importantly, the state court here recognized that many of the policy concerns identified in Buckley also apply in the context of a court-supervised medical monitoring fund (as opposed to damages). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:50 pm by Record on Appeal
In affirming the injunction against enforcement of the fundraising/spending provision of the ordinance, the Ninth Circuit relied on the distinction between limitations on campaign spending and campaign contributions made by the United States Supreme Court over three decades ago in Buckley v. [read post]